Skip to main content

What about John 8:1-11?

If you have any familiarity with the Bible, you will undoubtedly know the story about the woman caught in adultery found in John's gospel. According to the story, a group of religious leaders, scribes and Pharisees, bring a woman caught in the act of adultery demanding that Jesus act as judge over her fate. Jesus' famous retort: "let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her" is one of the most famous lines in all of scripture, known to most in the Western world.

Without going into many details, there is essentially good reason to believe that the Apostle John did not actually include the story in his original writing - the chief reason being it's absence from early manuscripts. This is not to say that the story isn't historical - clearly Jesus historically was at odds with the religious leaders, and the gospel of Mark, the earliest of the gospels, records several instances in which the Pharisees confront Jesus (Mark 7, 8, 11, 12). Putting aside the theological implications of Jesus' death for a moment, this climate of hostility towards Jesus eventually culminated in his crucifixion, an act of both religious (from the Pharisees) and political (from the Romans) persecution. That being said, an event that encompasses both of these forces at work seems to be well within the realm of possibility, that is, it seems fitting that the religious leaders would use a scenario in which Jesus would have risked a swift and deadly response from Rome for approving the use of capital punishment outside of Roman law - i.e. the Jewish legal responsibility to stone persons caught in the act of adultery.

Some scholars, such as Bart Ehrman for example, consider the story to be an addition by early New Testament scribes, who simply transcribed the story from the "margin notes" into the actual biblical text. Certainly this story, at the very least, was a known tradition at the time which is attested to in the Church Father's early writings.

Regardless of whether the story should be in the cannon or not and regardless of whether John recorded the story or not, I think there is value to this story when approached from a different perspective. If you know me, you know that I am deeply interested in the question as to how the early Christian community understood Jesus. If there is one thing I am thankful for in living in a post-modern framework, it is the recognition that there are many levels that barrier our understanding of history. The difference however, is that I believe it is possible to find a workable definition. I think there needs to be a resurgence in the way in which we approach our scriptural exegesis, it's a valuable pursuit to attempt to "turn back time" and view Jesus as close as possible through the original eyes that viewed him. We will never have a truly "objective" point of view, which is certainly obvious from the hundreds of differing theological positions, but we may indeed find comfort in the realization that the Holy Spirit has ensured a coherent framework for how the Church should function and think. In fact, I believe that the answers to understanding Jesus lie in this pursuit of history, from the past forward - our modern concept of individual exegesis, that is, projecting a purely personal point of view from the present backwards is foolishness. There is a reason that Christians have "interpreted" scripture to justify anything from war to abortion to the prosperity gospel - many of us are ignorant of the value of historical-exegesis.

In that sense, the beginning of  John 8 (if it was a scribal addition) acts as an exciting window into how the early church understood the message of Jesus. It is a sort of early church commentary on Jesus. We can read the beginning of John 8 and see the strong connection between Jesus' ethic and his Church, we see the impact. In a present world where people are still being stoned, both physically, and psychologically, for their "sins", we can find some model for how the Church is to respond. One thing remains, whether John did or did not record an actual event in history, the early Church certainly understood the implications of the radical message of Jesus Christ, which is something I am attempting to allow to develop my Christian worldview.

In any area where you land regarding John 8:1-11, one thing is for certain, it's something that can't be ignored.

Comments

Popular Posts

Let's Talk

I went to go check out a childhood friends facebook page in the winter of 2010. I hadn't talked to him since I was a teenager. I soon found out that I would never talk to him again,

I did a quick google search and found out that he had been apart of an online gaming community. I tracked him down to some forums where I suddenly became away that something tragic had befallen him.

The last time I had talked to him was shortly after I moved back to southwestern Ontario. I don't remember much of the conversation, except that he told me he was feeling depressed. I was 13 at the time and depression was just a word that I thought meant "sad". We caught up, talked about the trivial things that 13 year old boys talk about, but something wasn't right. We never talked again. 
Now 15 years later I was reading these words about a person who was once a close friend of mine. "What a f***ing coward." or "I can't believe someone could be that selfish.". It …

How are you feeling?

Response 1:

"I'm not sleeping again. It turns out my body might be reacting to antidepressants. The annoying symptom? Night sweats. We thought it might be lymphoma. It wasn't. That was a fun couple of weeks. I'm terrified. I'm terrified that this won't be the end of it, that the next medicine will fail too, and those absolutely terrifying impulses to harm myself and the thoughts of failure that I tell myself I am over and over and over and over and over and over again will one day be too much. Will these thoughts that only seem to stop in short intervals darken into complete mental breakdown? My biggest fear isn't snakes or falling, it's that I will end up on the street and lose my intellect and sanity, being mocked by people who don't know what mental illness is like. I'm afraid that the loneliness I seem to NEVER break from free from will enslave me into a life of dependence on others. I was doing so well but maybe wellness is just an illusio…

Did God Command Genocide?

If you've ever taken any interest in the debate between Christianity and Atheism, you've more than likely come across the following critique of the Bible: "The Old Testament God is hardly one to be worshipped. He's a vindictive, angry, jealous God who commands genocide!"

This line of attack is hardly unjustified. How are we to respond when we come across verses like these?  However, in the cities of the nations the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes. Completely destroy them - the Hitties, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, Jebusties - as the Lord your God has commanded you. (Deut 20:16-17) Go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys. (1 Sam 15:3) For some, the solution is easy. Simply pretend like these verses don't belong in the Bible. Problem solved. But this creat…